Skip to content
SEO Madmanby Adam Hafez

Product schema on a B2B store: +111% clicks, per Simplified Search

Simplified Search reports Product markup on one unnamed B2B ecommerce site lifted impressions 119% and clicks 111%, with no control group.

Published · 3 min read

Written byAdam HafezUpdated
Share
Markdown
A long row of stocked metal shelves inside a warehouse

Key takeaways

  • The author added Product markup dynamically to every product page of one large B2B ecommerce site and reports impressions up 119.14% and clicks up 111.13%.
  • Organic users rose 42.21% and organic sessions rose 37.44% after the Product rich feature was earned, according to the write-up.
  • The author states revenue from those pages rose more than 500%, or over $80K more than the previous period, but gives no baseline revenue.
  • There was no control group and the client is unnamed, so the result is a documented claim from one engagement, not a controlled test.
  • The same study found review markup on about 1,500 pages raised impressions 18.23% but cut clicks 8.47%, so structured data does not lift clicks by default.

What did Simplified Search test?

Ryan Shelley of Simplified Search studied whether earning a rich result changes impressions, clicks and organic traffic. His hypothesis was that schema.org markup would bring more of all three once a page earned a rich feature. The study covered 2,702 URLs across seven sites in software, local business, manufacturing, IT and marketing services, ranging from about 100 pages to more than 5,000. The window ran from January 2019 to June 2020.

He used Search Console’s Search Appearance filter to date when each feature was earned, and custom Google Analytics segments to isolate organic traffic to the tracked pages. Five features were tested: Product, review, the general rich results appearance, video and FAQ. Control groups were built where possible, but not for Product or review.

The Product test ran on a large B2B store, where Product markup was added dynamically to every product. Because it went on all products at once, there was no control group. The author states it was the only major SEO task performed on those pages during the test.

What results did the Product markup case report?

After the Product rich feature was earned, the author reports the following changes.

  • Impressions up 119.14%.
  • Clicks up 111.13%.
  • Organic users up 42.21%.
  • Organic sessions up 37.44%.

The author also reports revenue from those pages rose more than 500%, or over $80K more than the previous period. No baseline revenue, page count or exact dates for the Product test are given, so the size of the base is unknown.

His explanation is that the markup tagged product images for Google Image Search and put details such as price into the listing, which he reasons improved visibility and drew clicks. That is an inference, not something the test isolated.

How do the controlled tests in the same study compare?

They are the most useful part of the study, because they show what a comparison group changes. On the three features with a control group, the experimental pages gained far more impressions, but clicks did not always follow.

FeatureGroupImpressionsClicks
Rich resultsExperimental+106.88%+10.81%
Rich resultsControl+29.26%+41.16%
VideoExperimental+138.38%+21.64%
VideoControl+87.08%+65.82%
FAQExperimental+337.68%+817.60%
FAQControl+43.41%+71.75%

For rich results and video, the control pages grew clicks faster than the pages that earned the feature. Only FAQ beat its control on clicks, and the author notes some FAQ gains spiked and then normalized. FAQ is also now history: Google removed FAQ rich results from Search in May 2026.

Review markup on about 1,500 pages of another client, also uncontrolled, raised impressions 18.23% but lowered clicks 8.47% over roughly 30 days, while organic users rose 23.96%.

How much can this case prove about Product schema?

Less than the headline suggests. The site is anonymous, the figures are self-reported, and the Product test had no control group, so seasonality or other changes cannot be ruled out. The controlled tests elsewhere in the same study show that pages without a feature can grow clicks faster than pages with one. The author’s own conclusion is that his hypothesis was not fully proven: rich features lifted impressions, with mixed results for clicks and traffic.

What should ecommerce teams check before adding Product markup?

Start with which Google experience applies. Google’s Product documentation splits it in two: merchant listings for pages where customers can buy from you, and product snippets for product pages where people cannot buy directly, such as reviews. It also states that enhancements are shown at the discretion of each experience, so valid markup does not guarantee a rich result.

For product snippets, Google requires name plus one of review, aggregateRating or offers. It points to the Rich Results Test before deployment, and to the Merchant listings and Product snippets reports in Search Console afterwards. You can check a page’s markup against those fields with the Product snippet schema checker, and review rules are covered in Google’s review and AggregateRating requirements.

Then measure it the way this study could not: date the feature with the Search Appearance filter, hold back a set of comparable products where you can, and track revenue, not only clicks. For the markup fields themselves, see the structured data hub.

The evidence

Subject
Product markup on one large unnamed B2B ecommerce site
Timeframe
Jan 2019 to Jun 2020 study window
Verified
Yes, against first-party data
Impressions after Product rich feature119.14 % change
Clicks after Product rich feature111.13 % change
Organic users42.21 % change
Organic sessions37.44 % change
Revenue from product pages, more than500 % change
Additional revenue versus previous period, over80000 USD
Measured change
MetricBeforeAfter
Impressions after Product rich feature0% change119.14% change
Clicks after Product rich feature0% change111.13% change
Organic users0% change42.21% change
Organic sessions0% change37.44% change
Revenue from product pages, more than0% change500% change
Additional revenue versus previous period, over0USD80000USD

Sources

  1. 1.Case Study: The Impact of Rich Results on Impressions, Clicks, and Organic Traffic - Simplified Search, August 9, 2020Primary
  2. 2.Introduction to Product structured data on Google - Google Search CentralPrimary
  3. 3.Product snippet (Product, Review, Offer) structured data - Google Search CentralPrimary

Frequently asked questions

Is the client in this Product schema case study named?

No. The author describes only a large B2B ecommerce site. That limits outside verification, so treat the figures as the author's own reported results from one engagement.

Did Product markup alone cause the revenue gain?

The author says it was the only major SEO task on those pages during the test, but there was no control group. We report the numbers as stated and do not claim isolated causation.

Why are the before values zero?

The source gives percentage changes and an incremental revenue figure, not baseline counts. Zero is used as the before value so the stated change is recorded without inventing a baseline.

About the author

Adam Hafez
Adam Hafez

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC

Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.

  • Technical SEO
  • Search Console and GA4 measurement
  • Answer engine optimization
  • Structured data

The briefing

Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.

Follow