Skip to content
SEO Madmanby Adam Hafez
Algorithm UpdatesContent strategy

Scraper filter (2011): Google's change against copied content

In late January 2011 Google launched an algorithm change favouring original content over sites that scraped or copied it. What changed.

Published · 2 min read

Written byAdam Hafez
Share
Markdown
Person walking through a misty forest with sunbeams

Key takeaways

  • Matt Cutts confirmed on 28 January 2011 that the change had launched earlier that week.
  • It targeted sites that copy others' content and sites with low levels of original content.
  • Cutts said slightly over 2% of queries changed, and under half a percent noticeably.
  • Google had flagged the planned change on its official blog a week earlier, on 21 January 2011.
  • Google never named it; scraper filter is a label the SEO industry adopted.

What Google changed

On 21 January 2011, Matt Cutts wrote on the Official Google Blog that Google was evaluating several anti-spam changes, “including one change that primarily affects sites that copy others’ content and sites with low levels of original content.”

A week later, on his personal blog, Cutts confirmed that the change had launched. The intended result, he wrote, was that “searchers are more likely to see the sites that wrote the original content rather than a site that scraped or copied the original site’s content.” He thanked Jeff Atwood and the Stack Overflow team for feedback on the problem.

Google never named the change. Scraper filter is a label the SEO industry adopted. Moz’s algorithm update history lists the same change as the Attribution update.

When it rolled out

Cutts’s post of Friday 28 January 2011 said the change “was approved at our weekly quality launch meeting last Thursday and launched earlier this week.” Google did not give the exact day, so this page dates it to 28 January 2011, the first confirmed date; the real launch was a few days earlier. The Next Web reported the confirmation the same day. No completion date was stated.

What is known about its impact

Google’s only figures came from Cutts: “slightly over 2% of queries change in some way, but less than half a percent of search results change enough that someone might really notice.” He called it “a pretty targeted launch.” Google published no site-level figures.

What site owners should do

Google still acts against copied content, though not under this name. Its spam policies define scraping as taking content from other sites, often through automated means, to manipulate rankings. Its ranking systems guide describes original content systems that aim to show original content prominently, ahead of pages that merely cite it.

  • Publish original content and add value when you draw on other sources.
  • Do not republish feeds or copied pages with only light changes, such as swapped synonyms.
  • Use canonical markup when your content is legitimately syndicated, so Google can identify the primary page.

How to check whether it affected you

This is historical. Search Console keeps 16 months of data, so January 2011 can only be checked in archived analytics, by comparing Google organic traffic for the weeks either side of 24 January 2011. The Google Algorithm Updates timeline lists every update with its dates.

The evidence

Type
spam update
Started
28 January 2011
Completed
Not stated by Google
Confirmed by
Google statement
Name
Coined by the SEO industry

Sources

  1. 1.Algorithm change launched - Matt Cutts (Google), January 28, 2011Primary
  2. 2.Google search and search engine spam - Official Google Blog, January 21, 2011Primary
  3. 3.Google takes action against spam content with code tweak - The Next Web, January 28, 2011
  4. 4.Google algorithm update history - Moz
  5. 5.Spam policies for Google web search - Google Search CentralPrimary
  6. 6.A guide to Google Search ranking systems - Google Search CentralPrimary

Frequently asked questions

When did the 2011 scraper filter launch?

Matt Cutts wrote on 28 January 2011 that the change was approved at Google's weekly quality launch meeting the previous Thursday and launched earlier that week. Google gave no exact day, so 28 January 2011 is the first confirmed date.

How many searches did the scraper filter affect?

Cutts said slightly over 2% of queries changed in some way, but less than half a percent of search results changed enough that someone might really notice.

Was the scraper filter part of Panda?

No. It was a separate, earlier change. Google announced Panda about a month later, on 24 February 2011, as a broader algorithm aimed at low-quality sites.

Does Google still act against scraped content?

Yes. Google's spam policies list scraping as a violation, and its ranking systems guide describes original content systems that aim to show original content ahead of those who merely cite it.

About the author

Adam Hafez
Adam Hafez

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC

Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.

  • Technical SEO
  • Search Console and GA4 measurement
  • Answer engine optimization
  • Structured data

The briefing

Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.

Follow