
Key takeaways
- Matt Cutts confirmed on 28 January 2011 that the change had launched earlier that week.
- It targeted sites that copy others' content and sites with low levels of original content.
- Cutts said slightly over 2% of queries changed, and under half a percent noticeably.
- Google had flagged the planned change on its official blog a week earlier, on 21 January 2011.
- Google never named it; scraper filter is a label the SEO industry adopted.
What Google changed
On 21 January 2011, Matt Cutts wrote on the Official Google Blog that Google was evaluating several anti-spam changes, “including one change that primarily affects sites that copy others’ content and sites with low levels of original content.”
A week later, on his personal blog, Cutts confirmed that the change had launched. The intended result, he wrote, was that “searchers are more likely to see the sites that wrote the original content rather than a site that scraped or copied the original site’s content.” He thanked Jeff Atwood and the Stack Overflow team for feedback on the problem.
Google never named the change. Scraper filter is a label the SEO industry adopted. Moz’s algorithm update history lists the same change as the Attribution update.
When it rolled out
Cutts’s post of Friday 28 January 2011 said the change “was approved at our weekly quality launch meeting last Thursday and launched earlier this week.” Google did not give the exact day, so this page dates it to 28 January 2011, the first confirmed date; the real launch was a few days earlier. The Next Web reported the confirmation the same day. No completion date was stated.
What is known about its impact
Google’s only figures came from Cutts: “slightly over 2% of queries change in some way, but less than half a percent of search results change enough that someone might really notice.” He called it “a pretty targeted launch.” Google published no site-level figures.
What site owners should do
Google still acts against copied content, though not under this name. Its spam policies define scraping as taking content from other sites, often through automated means, to manipulate rankings. Its ranking systems guide describes original content systems that aim to show original content prominently, ahead of pages that merely cite it.
- Publish original content and add value when you draw on other sources.
- Do not republish feeds or copied pages with only light changes, such as swapped synonyms.
- Use canonical markup when your content is legitimately syndicated, so Google can identify the primary page.
How to check whether it affected you
This is historical. Search Console keeps 16 months of data, so January 2011 can only be checked in archived analytics, by comparing Google organic traffic for the weeks either side of 24 January 2011. The Google Algorithm Updates timeline lists every update with its dates.
Related updates
- The merchant reviews update was the previous announced change, in December 2010.
- The Panda update followed on 24 February 2011 with a broader attack on low-quality sites.
The evidence
- Type
- spam update
- Started
- 28 January 2011
- Completed
- Not stated by Google
- Confirmed by
- Google statement
- Name
- Coined by the SEO industry
Sources
- 1.Algorithm change launched - Matt Cutts (Google), January 28, 2011Primary
- 2.Google search and search engine spam - Official Google Blog, January 21, 2011Primary
- 3.Google takes action against spam content with code tweak - The Next Web, January 28, 2011
- 4.Google algorithm update history - Moz
- 5.Spam policies for Google web search - Google Search CentralPrimary
- 6.A guide to Google Search ranking systems - Google Search CentralPrimary
Frequently asked questions
When did the 2011 scraper filter launch?
Matt Cutts wrote on 28 January 2011 that the change was approved at Google's weekly quality launch meeting the previous Thursday and launched earlier that week. Google gave no exact day, so 28 January 2011 is the first confirmed date.
How many searches did the scraper filter affect?
Cutts said slightly over 2% of queries changed in some way, but less than half a percent of search results changed enough that someone might really notice.
Was the scraper filter part of Panda?
No. It was a separate, earlier change. Google announced Panda about a month later, on 24 February 2011, as a broader algorithm aimed at low-quality sites.
Does Google still act against scraped content?
Yes. Google's spam policies list scraping as a violation, and its ranking systems guide describes original content systems that aim to show original content ahead of those who merely cite it.
About the author

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC
Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.
- Technical SEO
- Search Console and GA4 measurement
- Answer engine optimization
- Structured data
The briefing
Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.
FollowRelated reading
Deepfake ranking update (2024): how Google demotes explicit fakes
On 31 July 2024 Google updated its ranking systems to demote explicit non-consensual fake content and sites with many removals for it.
February 2023 product reviews update: dates and what to do
Google's February 2023 product reviews update ran 14 days from 21 February to 7 March 2023 in 11 languages. Dates, scope and review guidance.
February 2026 Discover update: dates, what changed and what to do
Google's February 2026 Discover core update ran about 22 days, 5 to 27 February 2026, for English-language users in the US. What changed and what to do.
Fred update (2017): what Google said and what it means now
Fred is the name attached to a March 2017 Google ranking change. Google acknowledged an update but never detailed it; here is what is on record.



