
Key takeaways
- Google confirmed to Search Engine Land in October 2007 that it was lowering PageRank for some link sellers.
- Google said some link-selling sites could also be dropped or penalized in its results.
- Google's December 2007 blog post said buying or selling links that pass PageRank violated its guidelines.
- Google said most of the PageRank decreases followed a human review, not a fully automatic process.
- Today's spam policies still treat links bought for ranking as link spam unless marked sponsored or nofollow.
What Google changed
In October 2007, Google began lowering the toolbar PageRank shown for some sites that sold links passing PageRank. Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan reported on 7 October 2007 that Google “confirmed that PageRank scores are being lowered for some sites that sell links.” Google also told him some link-selling sites could be dropped or given penalties that kept them from ranking well.
Google then set out its position on its own site. Its Webmaster Central blog post of 1 December 2007 said “buying or selling links that pass PageRank violates our webmaster guidelines,” and listed the October confirmation to Search Engine Land among its past statements on the issue.
Google did not name this change. The name used here is descriptive; Search Engine Roundtable’s list of major updates calls it Paid Links.
When it rolled out
Google gave no launch date beyond October 2007. Search Engine Land’s report of Google’s confirmation was published on 7 October 2007, so this page uses that date; the exact start day is approximate. Sullivan wrote that he had noticed the drops the week before. Google stated no completion date.
What is known about its impact
Google published no figures on how many sites were affected. It told Search Engine Land that it was decreasing PageRank for only a subset of the link sellers it knew about, and that most of the decreases happened after a human review. Its December blog post confirmed that selling links can affect Google’s view of a site’s value and cause it to lose trust in the site. Lists of affected sites circulated in the press, but Google did not publish any.
What site owners should do
Google’s current spam policies still count “buying or selling links for ranking purposes” as link spam. They also say paid links are fine for advertising “as long as they are qualified with a rel=“nofollow” or rel=“sponsored” attribute value.”
- Mark every paid, sponsored or affiliate link with rel=“sponsored” or rel=“nofollow”.
- Do not buy links, or posts containing links, to improve rankings.
- If you received a manual action for link spam, fix the links before requesting reconsideration.
How to check whether it affected you
This is a historical question. Search Console keeps 16 months of data, and toolbar PageRank no longer exists, so the only evidence would be analytics archives from late 2007. For anything recent, the Google Algorithm Updates timeline lists every update with its dates, so you can check what rolled out when.
Related updates
- The Jagger update was an earlier update webmasters linked to link practices, in 2005.
- The Penguin update was Google’s first announced system against link spam, in 2012.
- The December 2022 link spam update used SpamBrain to neutralize unnatural links.
The evidence
- Type
- link spam update
- Started
- 7 October 2007
- Completed
- Not stated by Google
- Confirmed by
- Google announcement
- Name
- Coined by the SEO industry
Sources
- 1.Information about buying and selling links that pass PageRank - Google Search Central Blog, December 1, 2007Primary
- 2.Official: Selling Paid Links Can Hurt Your PageRank Or Rankings On Google - Search Engine Land, October 7, 2007
- 3.The History of Google's Updates - Search Engine Roundtable, August 11, 2011
- 4.Spam policies for Google web search - Google Search CentralPrimary
Frequently asked questions
Did Google confirm the 2007 PageRank changes?
Yes. Google confirmed them to Search Engine Land in October 2007, and its Webmaster Central blog post of 1 December 2007 said that selling links can lead to lower toolbar PageRank.
Why is it called the PageRank paid links update?
Google did not name it. The name here is descriptive; Search Engine Roundtable's list of major updates calls it Paid Links, and other industry histories call it the PageRank update.
What could a site that lost PageRank do?
Google said the owner could fix the guideline violations, make sure sold links no longer passed PageRank or were removed, and then submit a reconsideration request.
Is selling links still against Google's rules?
Yes, if the links pass ranking credit. Google's spam policies list buying or selling links for ranking purposes as link spam, but allow paid links marked rel=sponsored or rel=nofollow.
About the author

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC
Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.
- Technical SEO
- Search Console and GA4 measurement
- Answer engine optimization
- Structured data
The briefing
Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.
FollowRelated reading
Payday loan update (2013): what it changed and what it means now
Google's June 2013 ranking update for spammy queries such as payday loans, which the industry named the Payday loan update. What applies today.
Penguin 2.0 (2013): the next generation of Google's link spam fix
Google rolled out Penguin 2.0 on 22 May 2013, an updated webspam algorithm that affected about 2.3% of English-US queries. What changed and what it means.
Penguin 3.0 (2014): the link spam refresh and what it means now
Google confirmed a Penguin refresh on 17 October 2014, affecting less than 1% of English queries. Search Engine Land numbered it Penguin 3.0.
Penguin 4.0 (2016): real-time link spam and what it means now
Google's Penguin 4.0 launched on 23 September 2016, made Penguin real-time and more granular, and folded it into Google's core ranking systems.



