---
title: "NFON merged its country domains into one gTLD, and Austria grew"
url: https://seomadman.com/studies/nfon-cctld-consolidation-international-gtld-searchviu
section: studies
published: 2026-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
modified: 2026-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
author: Adam Hafez
topics: ["Technical SEO"]
---

# NFON merged its country domains into one gTLD, and Austria grew

## The short answer

searchviu documents how NFON, a European cloud telephony provider, merged separate country domains into one international gTLD with subdirectories. In Austria, organic traffic grew 90% in the first five months after the early 2015 migration versus the prior year, and organic leads grew 100%. Germany lost visibility first.

## Key takeaways

- After NFON moved nfon.at to nfon.com/at/ in early 2015, Austrian organic traffic grew 90% in the first five months versus the previous year.
- Leads generated through organic search in Austria grew 100% year over year in the same five-month window after the migration.
- The Germany migration lost most of its SEO visibility right after the switch, which the author ties to redirect chains rather than to the domain strategy.
- The author names several factors behind the growth, including content and technical work, so the domain move is a likely driver and not the only one.
- Once country versions share one domain their performance is closely connected, which cuts both ways when one market has a problem.

This is a write-up of a case documented by Eoghan Henn at searchviu, who says NFON was his client
at the time and that he had access to their numbers. We have not seen NFON's analytics ourselves,
so every figure below is the author's, and both are percentages: the source gives no absolute
traffic counts.

## Why would a company merge its country domains?

Henn's core argument is that pages on the same domain share ranking signals more easily than
pages on different domains, so links earned by one market help the others. He adds practical
reasons: one website is simpler and cheaper to manage than several, and a weak country site can
borrow strength from a stronger one. Google's own guide to
[multi-regional sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites)
frames the trade-off from the other side: a ccTLD gives a strong, clear geotargeting signal, while
subdirectories on a gTLD are easy to set up and low maintenance but less obvious to users.

## What NFON changed

NFON is a cloud telephone system provider operating in 12 countries. Its Austrian domain,
nfon.at, had been online since 2010 before it was merged into the international gTLD in early
2015, becoming nfon.com/at/. The German site moved from nfon.net to nfon.com/de/ at the end of
2013 or early 2014, and the UK site moved from nconnect.com to nfon.com/gb/.

## What the source reports

For Austria, the article states that organic traffic grew 90% in the first five months after the
migration compared with the previous year, and that leads generated through organic search grew
100% in the same time frame, year over year. Henn notes the migration came with a redesign, so the
domain switch cannot take all the credit.

Germany started differently. The old German domain had a manual penalty for unnatural link
building and a recovery of more than half a year in 2013 and 2014. After the switch, NFON lost most
of its German visibility directly, which the author attributes to redirect chains. For the
three years after the migration, he reports stable organic traffic growth in Germany for the
first time.

The UK section gives no percentage figures, but it is the closest thing to a reversal test. A
redesign weeks before the move had no noticeable effect; the boost came after the switch to
nfon.com/gb/. In May 2017 the UK team moved to nfon.co.uk, which, in Henn's words, did not have the
power to maintain the rankings and was even outranked by the English version on nfon.com. After
moving back to nfon.com/gb/, he says NFON was stronger than ever in the UK.

## What does the author say can go wrong?

Henn is explicit that there is no one-size-fits-all answer. His warnings:

- Merging one strong domain with several weak ones often fails; NFON's country domains already
  had history and decent link profiles.
- A brand new gTLD ranks less easily than an established one, and short-term losses are almost
  always part of a migration.
- Merged versions share negative signals too, such as harmful links or thin content, and their
  performance becomes closely connected.
- Different brands per country, local user preference for a ccTLD, or market-specific rules can
  rule the move out. He calls a mixed setup a viable option.

## What should you check before a merge?

The Germany dip is the practical lesson. Henn's advice is to redirect every old URL directly to its
new target, keep the old domains and their SSL certificates, update the links you control, and
connect the country versions with correct hreflang. Google's
[site move guide](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url-changes)
says the same about chains, advising a redirect to the final destination directly, and to keep
redirects generally for at least a year. Before launch, run your redirect map through the
[redirect chain analyzer](/tools/redirect-chain-analyzer) and generate the annotations with the
[hreflang tag generator](/tools/hreflang-tag-generator). Henn also recommended setting a country per
directory in Search Console; Google's current multi-regional guide no longer mentions that setting.

## How to read it

The author says several factors were at play, including content focus and a solid technical
foundation, and that he believes the international domain strategy was one of the most important
drivers. That is his judgment, not a controlled test. A single client, one migration and
year-over-year comparisons cannot separate the domain move from everything else changing at the
time. Treat it as a documented outcome, and note the Germany dip as the cost of a poorly executed
redirect plan.

## Sources

1. [Migrating from ccTLDs to a gTLD: The WHY, the HOW, and the WTF](https://www.searchviu.com/en/cctlds-to-gtld/) - searchviu (primary)
2. [Managing multi-regional and multilingual sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites) - Google Search Central (primary)
3. [Site moves with URL changes](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url-changes) - Google Search Central (primary)