--- title: "Google splits site reputation enforcement along the EEA border" url: https://seomadman.com/news/site-reputation-policy-eea-split section: news published: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z modified: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z author: Adam Hafez topics: ["Core updates", "Content strategy"] --- # Google splits site reputation enforcement along the EEA border ## The short answer From 30 August 2026, a manual action under Google's site reputation policy applies only to searchers outside the European Economic Area. Inside the EEA the penalty is not applied; Google says the affected section may instead be separated in its systems so that it ranks independently of the host domain over time. ## Key takeaways - Google announced on 28 August 2026 that site reputation manual actions take effect differently inside and outside the European Economic Area from 30 August. - Outside the EEA nothing changes: the manual action suppresses the affected portion of the site, and the rest of the domain is untouched. - Inside the EEA the manual action is not applied, and Google says the affected section may be separated in its systems so it ranks on its own merit rather than the host's. - Google attributes the change to discussion with the European Commission and states its concern that an overbroad reading of the DMA would block enforcement. - Search Console still reports the manual action, reconsideration requests still exist, and eligible sites can now take a dispute to mediation. Google has changed how it enforces the site reputation policy, and the change is geographic, not editorial. In a post dated 28 August 2026, the Search Quality team said that from 30 August, a manual action under the policy has one effect for searchers outside the European Economic Area and a different one for searchers inside it. ## What changed on 30 August **Outside the EEA, nothing is different.** A manual action still suppresses the portion of the site it was issued against; Google repeats that "the rest of the site won't be affected." **Inside the EEA, the penalty does not apply.** Instead, "the affected section of the site may be separated in our systems so that, over time, it ranks independently from the rest of the site." That is not the same mechanism: one is a penalty, the other removes an inherited advantage, so the subfolder stops borrowing the host domain's signal and has to earn its own position. ## Why a search policy is being drawn on a map **Google names the European Commission directly.** It attributes the split to "discussion with the European Commission" and states its own objection plainly: it remains concerned that "an overbroad application of the DMA could prevent us from addressing real threats to the integrity of our search results." **The underlying policy dates from 2024,** introduced to stop third-party content published on a trusted host purely to exploit that host's reputation: coupon subfolders on newspaper domains, casino reviews under university sites, licensed sections that exist only because the host ranks. ## What a site owner should do **Detection has not changed.** Google says site owners "will continue to be notified within Search Console when a manual action is applied," the same path you already watch. **The appeal path grew.** Reconsideration requests continue, and eligible sites now get the opportunity to bring disputes to mediation after one. **Measurement got harder for EEA-heavy sites.** Google notes "any given page might have a manual action taken on it, but that change will only affect search results shown to users outside the EEA." If your traffic concentrates in Europe, enforcement that would be obvious in a US-heavy export can be nearly invisible in yours. ## Why we care Split Search Console by country before diagnosing anything. A drop confined to non-EEA countries on a specific subfolder, with the rest of the domain flat, is this change's signature - and an EEA-only pattern is not evidence you escaped, since separation is gradual by design and shows up as a subfolder that stops outperforming its own content quality, not as a cliff. The decision this forces is editorial as much as technical: whether a section of your domain would survive on its own if it stopped inheriting the reputation of the masthead above it. ## Frequently asked questions ### Does this mean site reputation abuse is allowed in Europe now? No. The policy still applies and the manual action is still issued. What changes is the effect: for searchers inside the EEA the action is not applied to results, and Google says the affected section may instead be separated in its systems so it ranks independently of the host domain. ### Will Search Console still tell me if I am penalised? Yes. Google states that site owners continue to be notified in Search Console when a manual action is applied, regardless of which side of the border the effect lands on. ### What is new about mediation? Google says eligible sites will, following a reconsideration request, also have the opportunity to bring disputes to mediation. That is an escalation path that did not previously exist for this policy. ## Sources 1. [Update to the Site Reputation Policy](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/08/update-site-reputation-policy) - Google Search Central (primary) 2. [Site reputation abuse policy](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies) - Google Search Central (primary)